Cremation vs. Aquamation: Is Water Worth the Extra Cost?
You may see 'Aquamation' listed beside cremation. It often costs more. Is it a meaningful difference?
You may see "Aquamation" (also called alkaline hydrolysis or water cremation) listed beside traditional cremation. It often costs more. So… is it a meaningful difference, or just a trendy label?
It depends on what you care about: environmental impact, the *feel* of the process, availability in your area, and cost.
What's actually different
**Traditional cremation (fire):** uses high heat to reduce the body to bone fragments, which are then processed into the "ashes" you receive.
**Aquamation (water-based):** uses warm water, gentle circulation, and alkalinity to break down soft tissues over time, leaving bone material that is then processed similarly. Many people describe it as "closer to natural decomposition, just faster."
You may notice differences in the texture and color of the remains, but results can vary by provider and process.
Why some people prefer aquamation
Practical reality check
How to decide (a simple way)
If your main concern is "I can't handle the thought of fire," aquamation may be worth the extra cost for your own peace. If cost is tight, traditional private cremation is still a respectful, common choice—and you don't need to feel guilty about that.